Kit Cox, Field Applications Engineer, Mini-Circuits Japan

At the heart of every superheterodyne RF receiver, transmitter, or transceiver system is an RF/microwave mixer — the essential element for converting baseband signals into RF (in a transmitter) or RF into baseband signals (in a receiver).

All mixers have three ports:

  • IF: Intermediate frequency port (also called the baseband port)
  • LO: Local oscillator port (also called the carrier port)
  • RF: Radio frequency port

When used in a receiver, signals are inputted into a mixer’s LO and RF ports to produce an output at the IF port in a mixing process called downconversion.

Conversely, when used in a transmitter, signals are inputted into a mixer’s LO and IF ports to produce an output at the RF port in a mixing process called upconversion.

Any passive mixer can be used in either fashion. In both cases, the two input signals are being “mixed” to create two new signals at the output port: one at the sum frequency of the inputs (i.e. LO + (RF or IF)) and one at the difference frequency of the inputs (i.e. LO − (RF or IF)). In most applications, only one of these two products is desired, and the other will need to be suppressed.

A basic block diagram for an RF mixer as well as idealized downconversion and upconversion examples are shown in Figure 1:

Figure 1: Simplified schematic of an RF mixer and idealized downconversion and upconversion examples

Mixers started as the bread and butter of Mini-Circuits back when our founder, Harvey Kaylie, created the blockbuster SRA-1, the product represented in our logo and which we still produce to this day. Over the decades, Mini-Circuits has leveraged its mixer expertise and grown to offer hundreds of unique mixer models over six different circuit topologies. This variety gives designers options to suit just about every application requirement, even up to millimeter wave! With all these options, though, understanding the differences between all these mixer designs can complicate the component selection process — and that’s where this article comes in.

Today, we’ll provide a broad overview of the different mixer topologies, including both balanced and unbalanced architectures. It should be noted that, in theory, any nonlinear device can be used to make a mixer, but Schottky diodes and field effect transistors (FETs) are the most common. Mini-Circuits designs both diode- and FET-based mixers, but the topologies here will be presented using diode mixers for simplicity. However, the same principles can be applied to other technologies as well.

Unbalanced (Single Diode) Mixers

A single diode, or unbalanced, mixer is the simplest and oldest mixer topology. A single diode mixer is fundamentally a two-port device, with the RF and LO combined and fed into the diode, and the IF delivered on the other side of the diode. The schematic and time domain response of this topology is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Unbalanced / single-diode mixer schematic and time domain response.

One of the limitations of the unbalanced mixer is that in addition to the desired IF frequency (sum or difference), the output frequency spectrum also includes RF and LO signal content, and therefore requires a narrowband IF filter to reject the RF and LO frequency components of the output signal. The output RLC tank in Figure 2 is tuned to match the IF frequency. This means the single device mixer has a rather narrow IF bandwidth because it has no port isolation. Single diode mixers are used in economical receiver front-ends, and bandpass filters can be used at the input and output to separate the LO, RF, and IF signals. They can, however, be problematic if the RF and LO frequencies overlap and the filtering requirement becomes too difficult.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Unbalanced Diode Mixer

Advantages

  • Very useful in millimeter wave band
  • Economical
  • Lowest LO power requirement

Disadvantages

  • No isolation
  • Filtering results in narrow operation band
  • No rejection of LO AM noise or intermodulation products

Single Balanced Mixers

Single balanced mixers can remove either the LO or RF content from the IF output without the use of filters by using two diodes and a 180° hybrid coupler as a balun.

Early wideband receivers used a 90° hybrid combiner, which separated the RF and LO, but the isolation was dependent on how well the diodes were impedance matched. The 180° hybrid coupler solved this problem. This technique isolates the RF and LO ports and reduces unwanted intermodulation product. As shown in Figure 3, the RF and LO signals are applied to the sum and delta input ports of the hybrid, and the two corresponding hybrid outputs each feed a diode in turn (with one facing toward the hybrid and the other away). The outer ends of the diodes are tied together and taken as the IF output:

Figure 3: Simple block diagram of a single balanced diode mixer.

The signal applied to the 180° port of the hybrid (which can be configured to be either the LO or RF port) will be balanced and thus not appear at the IF output.

An example schematic of a single-balanced mixer is shown below in Figure 4 with the 180° hybrid at the RF and LO input ports and a low pass filter (LPF) at the IF output port (L1, C2, and C3 network):

Figure 4: Detailed schematic for a single balanced diode mixer.

The LO is applied to the 180° port and is thus balanced and suppressed from the IF port. Even so, it still drives the on/off action of the Schottky diodes to produce the mixing action. The RF signal is suppressed from the IF output by a capacitor to ground (C1) as well as a dedicated low-pass filter (LPF).

At higher LO powers, the diodes can self-bias, causing unacceptable conversion loss and isolation levels.  To avoid this, RF chokes (RFC) are shunted to ground between the coupler and the diodes.

Of the balanced mixer topologies, single-balanced mixers require the least amount of LO power. The LO or RF rejection at the IF output is typically between 20 and 30 dB.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Single Balanced Mixer Topology

Advantages

  • Requires least LO of the balanced types
  • Suppresses AM noise from LO
    (unbalanced does not)

Disadvantages

  • Only isolation of RF or LO without filtering
  • Filtering results in narrow operation band operation
  • Requires more LO power than unbalanced
  • Less linear than double-balanced
  • More conversion loss than double-balanced

Double Balanced Mixers

The double balanced mixer topology has four diodes in a ring or star configuration along with two baluns (one each for the RF and LO), and provides rejection of both the LO and RF content at the IF output. This means all ports are inherently isolated from each other without the need for filtering.  This is due to the combined properties of the ring diode circuit and the wideband baluns.  

Compared to single-balanced mixers, double-balanced diode mixers have more linearity and less spurious emissions. They also tend to have better conversion efficiency and can achieve broader bandwidths since no filtering is required at the IF port. However, this mixer architecture requires a higher LO drive level, and the ports are highly sensitive to reactive terminations.

The ideal application for a double-balanced mixer is a lower-cost application where moderate LO power is available and the RF and IF frequencies do not overlap.

Figure 6: Simplified block diagram of a double-balanced diode mixer.

An example double-balanced mixer schematic for the block diagram in Figure 6 is shown in Figure 7:

Figure 7: Detailed schematic of a double-balanced diode mixer.

The IF signal is tapped off of both the LO and RF baluns. Using separate baluns for the RF and LO ports provides isolation between the RF and LO ports, reducing the level of intermodulation products compared to that of an unbalanced mixer.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Double Balanced Diode Mixer

Advantages

  • Inherent isolation of both RF and LO
  • More linear than single-balanced
  • Less spurs than single-balanced
  • Broadband device (no filtering needed)

Disadvantages

  • Requires more LO power than single-balanced
  • Ports sensitive to reactive terminations

Triple-Balanced

The triple-balanced mixer topology further improves upon the linearity of double-balanced designs, but also requires yet higher LO power level for operation. The triple-balanced mixer uses eight diodes and several baluns, and is sometimes called “doubly double balanced” because it consists of two double balanced mixers in push-pull configuration.

A block diagram for a triple balanced mixer is shown in Figure 8 and a more detailed schematic is shown in Figure 9. Two hybrids are required for both the RF and LO ports, as well as a single hybrid coupler for the IF port:

Figure 8: Block diagram of a triple balanced diode mixer.

Figure 9: Detailed schematic of a triple balanced diode mixer.

This architecture provides better isolation and suppression of spurious and intermodulation products than the double balanced mixer topology. Triple balanced mixers also have a wide IF bandwidth. Triple-balanced mixers are ideal for applications where wideband signals need to be translated from one frequency range to another with minimal intermodulation products.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Triple Balanced Mixer Topology

Advantages

  • Best linearity
  • Ideal for wide band applications
  • Ideal for RF/IF overlap situations

Disadvantages

  • Requires the most LO power

Summary Comparison of Unbalanced and Balanced Mixer Topologies

The table below provides a broad comparison of all the balanced mixer topologies presented so far.

IQ mixers

The “I” in IQ stands for “in-phase” and the “Q” stands for “quadrature.” IQ mixers allow the two frequency sidebands to be handled separately using quadrature modulation where phase becomes a variable in data transmission. Quadrature modulation ultimately doubles the information content in a double-sideband transmission since each sideband can contain different information. The block diagram of an IQ mixer is shown in Figure 10:

Figure 10: Block diagram of an IQ mixer.

An IQ mixer comprises two mixers, each with the LO phase shifted by 90° from the other with a hybrid coupler. One mixer handles the in-phase LO component, and the other handles the quadrature component. The I and Q output signals are baseband signals combined into an RF signal for transmission. At the receiver, the process is reversed with the RF signal separated back into 1 and Q baseband channels. Any of the unbalanced or balanced mixer topologies discussed here can be used to create the IQ mixer configuration.

Mini-Circuits uses the terminology modulators/demodulators to classify IQ mixer products, which can be found under the “Modulators/Demodulators” section of the website.

Figure 11: Block diagram of an image reject / single sideband mixer.

An IR/SSB mixer is an IQ mixer with an additional hybrid coupler that is fed by the I and Q ports. The purpose of this additional coupler is to cancel one of the sidebands’ ports with a terminated load. The remaining coupler port is used as the output (IR / receive) or input (SSB / transmit) of the mixer. Any of the unbalanced or balanced mixer topologies discussed above can be used to create an IR / SSB mixer configuration.

For millimeter-wave IQ mixer applications, be sure to check out Mini-Circuits’ industry-leading SMIQ-653H-DG+ MMIC die with operation up to 65 GHz!

Read more about IQ mixers and their uses in single sideband (SSB) and image rejection applications in our related blog post I&Q Mixers, Image Reject Down-Conversion & Single Sideband (SSB) Up-Conversion.

Summary

Mini-Circuits offers one of the industry’s widest selection of RF and microwave mixers comprising all of the topologies discussed in this article. You should now be better equipped to navigate our catalog and find the right model for your requirements.

%d bloggers like this: